Better lambdas!!!!!!!!!!

[Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 20:16:42 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 09/10/2015 08:23 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>
>> That's one of the main reasons that I hate the idea of named 
>> arguments.
>> It's more stuff that's part of the API, more public stuff that 
>> you have
>> to name correctly and risk bikeshedding arguments over, and 
>> more stuff
>> that can you can't change without breaking existing code.
>>
>> - Jonathan M Davis
>
> Note that parameter names can already be determined by user 
> code using reflection.

True, but as soon as you're doing much with reflection, all bets 
are off anyway, because it often becomes trivial to break code by 
making small changes. And I think that it's pretty clear at this 
point that you can't expect parameter names to not change, since 
they're not part of the function signature (even if compile-time 
reflection does let you get at them), which would not be the case 
if we had named arguments.

- Jonathan M Davis