Moving back to .NET

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 18:30:35 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
Grøstad wrote:
> I think the process changes a lot when you are working with an 
> actual language spec for several years and get experimental 
> implementations in compilers a long time before release. Add 
> also the number of qualified eyeballs looking at proposals... I 
> don't think the C++ designers have made many serious mistakes 
> in the last few iterations (although it could happen again in 
> C++17 ;^).

Though there was a questionable change in C standard: 
introduction of timespec, which locally redefined meaning of 
time_t as a transparent type, along with legacy definition of 
time_t as an opaque type. Maybe legacy definition could be 
dropped, but it didn't happen.