std.experimental.testing formal review
Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Sep 28 03:03:07 PDT 2015
Review of std.experimental.testing formal review
the two weeks of the formal review phase are over.
The review thread was very shallow. Dicebot again expressed this
disaffection with the assert function names
"should(BeTrue|BeFalse|...)" No agreement could be found.
Personally, I'm not sure if an agreement can be found, as this is
more a personal style question rather then technical question.
Some minor comments still need to be addressed:
std.experimental.testing.reflection.TestData fields have no DDoc
I will start the voting thread a week from now.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list