Moving back to .NET

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 30 September 2015 at 07:44:09 UTC, Laeeth Isharc 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 29 September 2015 at 16:19:19 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
> Grøstad wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 29 September 2015 at 15:31:30 UTC, Laeeth Isharc 
>> wrote:
>>> We know that you think D is a toy language, although you also 
>>> say that you aren't calling it a toy language.
>>
>> That's a rather manipulative assertion.
>
> That's a statement about intent that is based on a poor 
> reading.  And my statement - whatever you may perceive its 
> intent to be - is based purely on what you have said (both that 
> D is a toy language - in your view this being an entirely 
> factual assertion - and that you are not calling D a toy 
> language).
>
> http://forum.dlang.org/search?q=ola+toy&scope=forum

I am tired of your manipulative mind games.

 From 
http://forum.dlang.org/post/amosmrxatnkntpgsjpqz@forum.dlang.org :

«I said "if D is a toy language". That is not calling it 
anything. But it is, like Rust, a toy language by academic use of 
the phrase which is not a pejorative term, but an affectionate 
term in my book. The pejorative term is to call a language a 
"hack". C++ is a hack. String mixins is a hack. Etc.»