Could we reserve void[T] for builtin set of T ?

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2016-03-31 21:24, deadalnix wrote:
> Pretty much as per title. I has that in the back of my mind for a while.
> Would that work ?

An alternative syntax for declaring a set could be:

[int] set;

Not sure if that conflicts with any existing syntax.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg