stc.experimental.ndslice -> sci.ndslice

[Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 18 April 2016 at 16:13:54 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
> As I have said many times on both IRC and NG, I would prefer to 
> have `stdx` instead of ridiculously long (4x) 
> `std.experimental`. Then you would have a nice package named 
> `stdx.sci`.

How often are you typing in import statements that their length 
becomes a problem?