stc.experimental.ndslice -> sci.ndslice

[Seb via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 19 April 2016 at 01:13:01 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 06:10:34 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
>> We plan to add a set of numeric packages and this would be 
>> real pain if they would be one-by-one moved from experimental 
>> to stable std. So sci.* should be considered as experimental 
>> during few years.
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/4207
>
> sci as in ?
>
> If it is as in science, please just name this science. We have 
> terabytes of hard drive, we can do with 4 extra characters.

It's the same reason why std is not called "standard" - 
programmers are pretty lazy and a top level module name does 
appear quite often.