DMD internal: appendToModuleMember performance
David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Apr 22 11:55:43 PDT 2016
On Friday, 22 April 2016 at 18:51:57 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> As long as elements are not removed too frequently (what do
> your numbers say?), the performance impact of doing a full
> linear search in those cases shouldn't be too bad.
Note that a (properly tuned) probabilistic data structure like a
Bloom filter allows you to avoid having to keep a full second
copy of the list around, hopefully making it possible to keep the
optimisation on by default without regrets. (For tiny modules
with only a small number of members, you can still do the linear
search to skip the hash lookup.)
— David
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list