stc.experimental.ndslice -> sci.ndslice

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 09:09:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 08:49:53 UTC, Seb wrote:
>> On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 07:35:19 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko 
>> wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 07:30:38 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
>>>> I don't understand, what's wrong with std.sci or etc.sci?
>>>
>>> I am ok with std.sci for example. I just want to exclude 
>>> dances with transaction between stable <->`experimental`. So, 
>>> if all `std.sci` would be marked as experimental during few 
>>> years this would what i want.
>>>
>> Another idea would be to go with std.experimental.sci.*, if 
>> that has a higher consensus.
>
> Just with std.sci.* without `experimental`. Otherwise this 
> would be the same problem.

Why ... ?  Just keep everything in std.experimental.sci until all 
the details are worked out, and only transition to std.sci in one 
go once it's all done.