String lambdas

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 03:15:36 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 00:14:41 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> More generally, it is not clear what is allowed to do for 
>> merging functions. In C/C++ it is assumed that different 
>> function MUST have different identities.
>
> I don't think this needs to hold true for anonymous functions 
> though. If they have the same representation twice, it is 
> arguably just the same function referenced twice.

I'm not enough of a language lawyer to know that. But I can tell 
you that compiler do not take advantage of this at this stage. 
Maybe it is because lambda are fairly new, I'm not sure.