String lambdas
Bauss via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Apr 30 09:04:13 PDT 2016
On Saturday, 30 April 2016 at 16:02:02 UTC, Bauss wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 17:58:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
>> [...]
>
> An alternative to string lambads could be something like a
> shortened version of lambdas like consider
>
> [...]
%1 and %2 should be %0 and %1 and also the < should be > in the
return statement of course.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list