Inheritance of mixin

[Ed via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 30 April 2016 at 01:06:18 UTC, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Friday, 29 April 2016 at 19:11:24 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
>> Rare as in, "effecting only a very small amount of real world 
>> code" - not as in "effecting only a very small number of 
>> people".
>
> [...]
>
> Additionally, any libraries that provide a base class with a 
> mixin require inheritors to know about that mixin and provide 
> it in their own code.
>
> [...]

It looks like you miss the solution proposed above, using a 
template this parameter. It's very clear and consise ! Actually 
the mixin is even not necessary.