ISO D

[Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d]

On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 08:02 +0000, eugene via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Hello, everyone,
> will ISO D be in future or not?

I am not sure this would be a good thing. Given the history of Fortran,
C, and C++, avoiding ISO standardization processes  would seem to be a
good thing for any other programming language. Even the Java process is
fairly dreadful.

Having a sensible version release programme is more important that a
standard, though having a formal language specification in machine
readable format is a good idea.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20160817/4aea2388/attachment.sig>