ISO D

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On 08/17/2016 02:34 PM, eugene wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 at 10:47:35 UTC, qznc wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 at 08:02:42 UTC, eugene wrote:
>>> will ISO D be in future or not?
>>
>> What would be the benefits?
> 
> unified language standard?

Unified among whom? There is only one feature complete D frontend right
now. I'd say that the moment second competing frontend appears would be
exactly the proper time to think about formal standartization.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20160817/d452ec59/attachment.sig>