Low level unit test library in druntime

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2016-08-30 16:44, Atila Neves wrote:

> I'm obviously very biased but having written a unit testing library that
> I'm happy with and proud of I'd just use that instead. I wouldn't be
> interested in this.

The point of this low level library is that a high level unit test 
library, like your unit-threaded, can use the low level library in 
druntime. If this was to be implemented I imagine we could move some 
code from unit-threaded to this low level library. No need for unit test 
frameworks to reimplement the low level stuff that would be very similar.

> I'd much rather have `assert` be magical or have AST macros to make the
> syntax for writing tests better than what it is now.

That would be nice to have.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg