D future ...

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 12/19/2016 11:12 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 12/19/2016 10:56 PM, Suliman wrote:
>>> The whole focus on C++ people marketing is simply wrong! Every time
>>> this gets mentioned in external forums, the language gets a pounding
>>> by people with the same argumentation. Why go for D when C++ 20xx
>>> version does it also.
>>
>> +100
>>
>> I totally agree with another part of post. Plus the docs is really suks,
>> not only I can't write code without copy-past examples, because it's
>> simply very hard to understand how to use one ore another function. Even
>> simple writeln docs very bloated and 80% (mostly format futures) do not
>> needed in real life
>
> I took a look out of curiosity.
> https://dlang.org/library/std/stdio/writeln.html indeed has no direct
> exmaple and sends the reader to
> https://dlang.org/library/std/stdio/write.html. That one also has n
> direct example and sends the user to
> https://dlang.org/library/std/stdio/std_conv.html, which is a 404.
>
> That's pretty bad. I'll create an issue.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16991