Multiple return value as requirements for safety and performance

[Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 15:40:57 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
> DIP-32 has been dormant since 2013. I've been waiting for 
> builtin tuples ever since I started using D.

I wonder if it might be possible to add the tuple syntax 
incrementally into DMD? It's always easier to approve something 
less complex.

Could the comma expression be contextually removed? Specifically 
in return expressions as discussed initially in this post?