DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 12/20/2016 03:46 AM, Joakim wrote:
> I didn't just say "eh:" I gave evidence for why I think the problem is
> minimal and asked why it's so important to scope those last 3-4 imported
> modules too, which you didn't answer.

You have asked for a smoking gun, and one has been found.

I have just uploaded a major update that carefully analyzes the 
improvements brought about by switching to local imports in the D 
Standard Library. Please refer to the section "Workaround: Are Local 
Imports Good Enough?" and Appendix A:

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/pull/51/files

https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/91baecedcfe7cb75ac22e66478722ec797ebb901/DIPs/DIP1005.md


Andrei