D future ...

[ikod via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 09:35:31 UTC, Andrey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 07:47:08 UTC, O-N-S wrote:
>> On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 23:02:59 UTC, Benjiro wrote:
>>> I split this from the "Re: A betterC modular standard 
>>> library?" topic because my response is will be too much 
>>> off-topic but the whole thread is irking me the wrong way. I 
>>> see some of the same argument coming up all the time, with a 
>>> level of frequency.
>>>
>>
>> Five stars of five!
>>
>> Regards, Ozan
>
> Read all branche of topic. See ability to make social research.
>
> Age'meter)))
>
> Andrei,Walter > 45;
> Benjiro,Dicebot 20-27;
> others - difficult to say right now; need more time;
>
> don't want to upset anyone, just a joke )))

How do you use language is more important than your age. 
Scientist or AI developer expect highest performance for 
number-crunching and don't care about fast and easy 
development/deployment/etc. Devops (like me) don't care about 
super-performance, but care about easy development (read - 
libraries availabilty, easy debugging, etc) and deployment, 
gamedev probably care about GC and I don't know what else. 
Language core team can choose to care about every or only about 
some specific categories of developers.

And one note on volunteer model of language development - it have 
obvious pro and contra. how much this "contra" affect language 
progress depends on the language creators and community goals.