Red Hat's issues in considering the D language

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2016-12-21 15:58, Madaz Hill wrote:

> I'd like to add that the windows version would require another change so
> that DMD becomes true FOSS. Unless the 32 bit version get dropped away,
> the standard C library, snn.lib, is even not open-sourced (which is a
> worst than the backend situation) !

A. The 64bit version uses the Microsoft tool chain, how is that more 
open source?

B. It's possible to use the Microsoft tool chain when compiling for 
32bit as well

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg