CTFE thoughts & functional approach

[Robert M. Münch via Digitalmars-d]

On 2016-02-02 08:39:34 +0000, deadalnix said:

> That is definitely true that the compile time API is kind of screwy. 
> That's definitively not you. I think the best path forward at this 
> stage is to provide nice API as a library on top of it.

And if we do this, it's only a small step to add a functional layer to 
deal with this API where I can chain tranformations to generate my code.

My point to discuss was, that I think the combination "compile time 
API" + "compile time suited language" is something different than the 
road currently followed.

-- 
Robert M. Münch
http://www.saphirion.com
smarter | better | faster