voldemort stack traces (and bloat)
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Feb 8 05:01:44 PST 2016
On 2/7/16 12:18 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> I have a library where I was using very many voldemort types a la
> std.range.
>
[snip]
> Is there a better way we should be doing this? I'm wondering if
> voldemort types are really worth it. They offer a lot of convenience,
> and are much DRYer than separate private template types. But the bloat
> cost is not really worth the convenience IMO.
I modified all my voldemort-returning functions to return module-level
types.
One of my example programs (compiled optimized/inline) went from 10MB to
1MB. The other example program went from 2.1MB to 900k.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list