Head Const
Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Feb 18 04:52:10 PST 2016
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 11:20:53 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Consider "static if is fundamentally flawed" vs "static if is
> fundamentally flawed [when applied to existing idiomatic C++
> code]". Former is opinionated prejudice. Latter can quite
> easily be true (even if I personally wouldn't agree with it).
It isn't fundamentally flawed, but it is much weaker than a
constraint-solver.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list