Unum II announcement

[jmh530 via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 23 February 2016 at 13:46:33 UTC, Charles wrote:
>
> This seems to be the opposite of what I'd need unfortunately. 
> The likelihood of convincing them to use D is probably zero. In 
> general, they're closer to mathematicians then programmers.

So was John von Neumann, :)

I probably wouldn't press the issue with them. D really isn't yet 
at a place for me to fully replace the stuff I could do in 
R/Matlab/Python. Maybe when this happens:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/ynbohmjwbhjglxjjclzk@forum.dlang.org

To me, the case for learning D is the same as if you find 
yourself learning to call C++ from one of those languages. If 
your code runs well enough without needing C++ (for whatever 
reason, speed, memory use, etc), it probably doesn't need D 
either. It's just more fun to write D than C++.