D in Ubuntu apps ecosystem
Joakim via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Feb 26 07:53:44 PST 2016
On Friday, 26 February 2016 at 09:25:19 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
> On Thursday, 25 February 2016 at 19:21:48 UTC, Joakim wrote:
>> But can such a powerful phone handle Ubuntu Touch? ;) The
>> preliminary reviews for the Meizu Pro 5 Ubuntu Edition, which
>> you're presumably referencing, are not good, even though the
>> hardware is spec-ed out, because the Ubuntu software is
>> supposedly slow and laggy. I was hopeful for the previous
>> Ubuntu on Android effort years ago, but it never went anywhere.
>> I bet this one won't either.
>
> Based on my own experience with an Ubuntu phone (it's my daily
> driver, and I have the least-powerful hardware of the existing
> commercially released phones), I think that the reviews are
> just possibly not coming from an unbiased position. ;-)
I don't know that anybody cares about Ubuntu enough to be biased
against it. Vlad Savov said he wanted to like it, but couldn't:
http://www.theverge.com/2016/2/23/11097126/meizu-pro-5-ubuntu-edition-specs-price-release-date-mwc-2016
Of course, this is pre-release software and likely a newer
version of Ubuntu than what you're running, so maybe they'll get
it all to work well soon, if it did in the past on your phone.
>> Well, it took us a long time to get on the currently most
>> popular OS platforms, iOS and Android, and we still have no
>> apps on there, so I don't think this tiny Ubuntu niche will
>> get much dev effort. But if you or someone else believes in
>> and wants to develop for it, more power to you.
>
> Well, if I understand right, the hardest part of the work
> (making sure things run OK on ARM) has substantially been done
> by you and others. Assuming that works, I would anticipate
> that the major part of the requirements would be the bindings
> to the Ubuntu SDK.
Mostly others, I just fixed a few ARM bugs here and there: most
of the code needed for ARM was written by David, Dan, Johannes,
and others. Yeah, now that ldc has good codegen for ARM,
including the Raspberry Pi
(https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/1283), all Ubuntu
should require is OS bindings.
> I do think the Ubuntu offerings are compelling in terms of how
> they restructure the phone/tablet experience, particularly in
> terms of how they structure things like the security and
> permissions models, and the separation between
> hardware-interaction-layer vs. core OS vs. application space
> and the prospects there for consistent software deployment (and
> updates) across many different devices.
Sounds interesting, the Scopes UI seems cool too. I was mostly
talking about the small userbase and how it'd be tough to justify
investing much time into it. But if someone really wants D on
there, that'd be great. :)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list