Why is mangling different for separate compilation?

[John Colvin via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 28 February 2016 at 12:59:53 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> On Saturday, 27 February 2016 at 11:31:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
>> On Saturday, 27 February 2016 at 11:27:39 UTC, Walter Bright 
>> wrote:
>>> On 2/27/2016 1:12 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
>>>> I've had similar problems in the past with template mixins. 
>>>> It seems D's
>>>> compile-time features don't mix with any kind of separate 
>>>> compilation, which is
>>>> a shame.
>>>
>>> Any ideas on how unit tests should be named?
>>
>> Why has the additional count been added?  You're already using 
>> the line number to differentiate unit test blocks.  For unit 
>> test blocks that are all on one line? ;)
>
> I guess that makes sense. And it'd link!
>
> Atila

You could always add an additional number to uniquely identify 
them if there are multiple unittests on one line. It would seem 
weird to have a special case in the grammar for unittests.