vibe.d benchmarks

[Etienne Cimon via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 1 January 2016 at 11:38:53 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 18:23:17 UTC, Etienne Cimon 
> wrote:
>> On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 13:29:49 UTC, Daniel Kozak 
>> wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 12:09:30 UTC, Etienne Cimon 
>>> wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> When I use HTTPServerOption.distribute with libevent I get 
>>> better performance but with libasync it drops from 20000 
>>> req/s to 80 req/s. So maybe some another performance problem
>>
>> I launch libasync programs as multiple processes, a bit like 
>> postgresql. The TCP listening is done with REUSEADDR, so the 
>> kernel can distribute it and it scales linearly without any 
>> fear of contention on the GC. My globals go in redis or 
>> databases
>
> ?

With libasync, you can run multiple instances of your vibe.d 
server and the linux kernel will round robin the incoming 
connections.