vibe.d benchmarks

[Etienne Cimon via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 at 10:11:36 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 08:23:26 UTC, Laeeth Isharc 
> wrote:
>>  [...]
>
> vibe.d _was_ faster than Go. I redid the measurements recently 
> once I wrote an MQTT broker in Rust, and it was losing to 
> boost::asio, Rust's mio, Go, and Java. I told Soenke about it.
>
> I know it's vibe.d and not my code because after I got the 
> disappointing results I wrote bindings from both boost::asio 
> and mio to my D code and the winner of the benchmarks shifted 
> to the D/mio combo (previously it was Rust - I figured the 
> library was the cause and not the language and I was right).
>
> I'd've put up new benchmarks already, I'm only waiting so I can 
> show vibe.d in a good light.
>
> Atila

The Rust mio library doesn't seem to be doing any black magic. I 
wonder how libasync could be optimized to match it.