std.experimental.logger formal review round 3
Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Jan 6 08:30:23 PST 2016
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 16:51:26 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
> please review
Two small doc issues on
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_experimental_logger.html
"The LogLevel of an log call" -> "[...] a log call"
"[...] or The additional f enables printf-style logging" missing
parts of a preceding sentence?
Bastiaan.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list