vibe.d benchmarks

[Nikolay via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 04:02:39 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
>
> It's possible that those cache misses will be irrelevant when 
> the requests actually do something, is it not? When a lot of 
> different requests are competing for cache lines, I'd assume 
> it's shuffling it enough to change these readings

I believe cache-misses problem is related to old vibed version. 
There was to many context switch. Now vibed uses SO_REUSEPORT 
socket option. It reduces context switch count radically.