Anyone using DMD to build 32bit on OS X?

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2016-01-10 23:15, Guillaume Piolat wrote:

> I'm using 32-bit support of DMD and I would strongly prefer if it wasn't
> removed. At least staying the same as today.
>
> The problem is that I don't control what bitness users want, because of
> network effects some users still use 32-bit software. Every product in
> this space is Universal Binaries with both 32-bit and 64-bit arch.

Fair enough.

> You can drop OSX 10.6, which is not officially supported anyway, it
> would bring compat the same as LDC. No problem as far as I'm concerned,
> very few people are using 10.6 (at least that's what they say in polls).

Ok, that would mean 10.7 for 64bit and 10.6 (or whatever the current 
requirements are) for 32bit.

> I have a question, does your work solves shared libraries leaking after
> unload, or is it unrelated? :)

I doesn't solve the problem but it's a prerequisite for solving dynamic 
libraries. That's why I started working on this :)

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg