C++17

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 09:33:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> No that would be stupid to make that the default as it is 
> unsafe.

When would you estimate that D could have a production ready 
default memory managment solution (without GC)?

When people look at a language they don't ask themselves what is 
possible, but what the main features are and how convenient it 
looks.

So from a (C/C++) marketing point of view it is better to send 
the message "excellent memory management with optional GC" than 
"GC backed memory with optional..."