Go's march to low-latency GC

[thedeemon via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 14 July 2016 at 10:58:47 UTC, Istvan Dobos wrote:
>  I was thinking, okay, so D's GC seems to turned out not that 
> great. But how about the idea of transplanting Rust's ownership 
> system instead of trying to make the GC better?

This requires drastically changing 99% of the language and it's 
bringing not just the benefits but also all the pain coming with 
this ownership system. Productivity goes down, learning curve 
goes up. And it will be a very different language in the end, so 
you might want to just use Rust instead of trying to make D 
another Rust.