The Case Against Autodecode
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Jun 1 10:00:40 PDT 2016
On 06/01/2016 12:41 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> As has been explained countless times already, code points are a non-1:1
> internal representation of graphemes. Code points don't exist for their
> own sake, their entire existence is purely as a way to encode graphemes.
Of course, thank you.
> Whether that technically qualifies as "memory representation" or not is
> irrelevant: it's still a low-level implementation detail of text.
The relevance is meandering across the discussion, and it's good to have
the same definitions for terms. Unicode code points are abstract notions
with meanings attached to them, whereas UTF8/16/32 are concerned with
their representation.
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list