Lifetime tracking
tsbockman via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jun 2 16:12:35 PDT 2016
On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 23:05:40 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> Whenever the type checker is using a certain piece of
> information to check validity of a program, there should be a
> way to pass that kind of information across function
> boundaries. Otherwise the type system is not modular. This is a
> serious defect.
Would you mind giving a brief example of how that applies to
`scope`?
(I'm asking for my own education; I have no personal opinion as
to the right implementation at the moment.)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list