Phobos needs a (part-time) maintainer

[Chris via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 3 June 2016 at 04:12:55 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 21:04:46 UTC, qznc wrote:
>> On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 20:59:52 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>> Eventually I'll come back to bugfix if they take Jake, but 
>>> not you Seb.
>>> For a reason or another I don't like you wilzbach.
>>
>> You are frustrated. I get that.
>>
>> Don't make this personal for others, please. Maybe you should 
>> ignore this thread for today?
>
> My POV is that it's easy to fix some phobos bug. But to get the 
> easy fixes merged is a PITA. PRs that fixe a bug are hard to 
> get merged. Why ? I don't know. Sometime we have to act like a 
> bully to get a PR merged and that's not normal.
>
> Perso I give up.

No need to get emotional over code. But I do agree that bug fixes 
should be fast tracked. How hard would it be to set up a priority 
queue? Say 1. bug fixes 2. performance enhancement 3. ...