[RFC] D Improvement Proposals: Move to git + markdown?
Seb via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jun 7 13:50:48 PDT 2016
On Thursday, 26 May 2016 at 22:05:52 UTC, Seb wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 May 2016 at 11:39:45 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
>> I'm in favour of this, Seb. IMO, the pros outweigh the cons.
>> Integrated peer-review is a big win.
>
> We already see at our github repos that peer review/help is
> great, so why not for the DIPs?
Pinging this one last time as "consensus on strategies, basic
project management for bigger features, better administration of
DIPs and module review queue" is on the draft vision of Andrei
and Walter for the next six months!
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list