std.experimental.checkedint is ready for comments!

[tsbockman via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 at 18:50:32 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
> What you are proposing is *not* "fixing" my design - it is 
> basically scrapping it and replacing it with a ground-up 
> rewrite, with perhaps some bits and pieces and general 
> inspiration taken from my work.
> [...]
> If the decision is made to accept the high-level design, then 
> we can go back to bikeshedding about names, fixing typos, 
> tweaking/trimming the API, etc.

I should mention that one possible "trimming" would be to remove 
either `SmartInt`/`smartOp` or `SafeInt`/`safeOp`. I don't *want* 
to do this, obviously, but I wouldn't categorize it as "scrapping 
the design", either.