Anybody still using the chm docs

[Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 at 10:58:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> So I'm wondering if in 2016 someone really needs an offline 
> copy of a website shipped with a binary release?

For offline browsing, Windows and Linux users can use Zeal [1] 
which is FOSS, and macOS users can use Dash[2], which is free as 
in beer. Both of which can use this D docset [3].

So no, there's no reason to maintain the chm docs.

[1] https://zealdocs.org/
[2] https://kapeli.com/dash
[3] 
https://github.com/Kapeli/Dash-User-Contributions/tree/master/docsets/D#readme