Anybody still using the chm docs

[Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 16 June 2016 at 02:32:05 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 at 10:58:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> So I'm wondering if in 2016 someone really needs an offline 
>> copy of a website shipped with a binary release?
>
> For offline browsing, Windows and Linux users can use Zeal [1] 
> which is FOSS, and macOS users can use Dash[2], which is free 
> as in beer. Both of which can use this D docset [3].
>
> So no, there's no reason to maintain the chm docs.
>
> [1] https://zealdocs.org/
> [2] https://kapeli.com/dash
> [3] 
> https://github.com/Kapeli/Dash-User-Contributions/tree/master/docsets/D#readme

Thanks for the Zeal, I did not know about it.
Both Gnome and KDE have their "help" tools that more/less do the 
same.