Phobo's migration

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 at 19:02:38 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 at 17:55:11 UTC, Joerg Joergonson 
> wrote:
>> How is that? That makes no sense. If Phobo's is production 
>> ready as claimed then freezing it can't make it automagically 
>> non-production ready, can it?
>
> D cannot afford to be stagnant in a time of fierce language 
> competition. C++ almost died off completely outside of a couple 
> of niches because it stood still for so long. D does not have 
> the momentum to carry it for even a half year of no 
> improvements.
>
>> I didn't say they wernt, but they are being done on phobos
>
> Honest question: have you ever looked into Kaizen and lean 
> management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaizen? Because 
> stopping everything in Phobos and waiting for "breakthroughs" 
> is a dead on arrival plan. A continuous improvement process is 
> much more viable, realistic, and likely to produce good results.

This is not true. There are many development methodologies and 
most of them are not suitable for designing programming 
languages, including all "lean" methodologies.