Phobo's migration

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 at 17:55:11 UTC, Joerg Joergonson 
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 at 16:51:32 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 at 16:44:25 UTC, Joerg Joergonson 
>> wrote:
>>> How bout Freezing Phobos, except for bugs and start migrating 
>>> it to Phobos 2.0?.
>>
>> This would kill the language.
>
> How is that? That makes no sense. If Phobo's is production 
> ready as claimed then freezing it can't make it automagically 
> non-production ready, can it?

The DMD developers refuse to use Phobos in the D compiler, so 
Phobos is obviously not production ready.

(Plenty of compilers use the C++ standard library.)

I agree with the need for a D3 and a completely redesigned 
standard library though. But it will only happen as a fork, not 
from within the current team...