Proposed Enhancement: Deprecate std.conv.text With 0 Arguments

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 6/22/16 1:12 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 at 17:04:54 UTC, Meta wrote:
>> Intentional or not, I don't see any downside to disallowing calling
>> text with 0 args (aside from backwards-compatibility concerns). It
>> doesn't even return anything useful, just null.
>
> Well, the idea is that the function is a string constructor so it
> returns d/w/string.init with nothing passed in.

I think it's worthy of a change. if(something); used to be valid code. 
But it's more likely to be an erroneous semi-colon. Making this an error 
was a huge win.

Same thing with text with no args. You're actually better off using "" 
or string.init.

-Steve