Please rid me of this goto

[Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d]

On 24.06.2016 05:22, Timon Gehr wrote:
>
>>
>> ... break the laws of physics by
>> arbitrarily defining something to be true when it is not.
>> ...
>
> Utter nonsense. (Also note that the 'laws of physics' typically give
> rise to piecewise analytic functions, and if you only consider analytic
> functions, 0 ^ 0 = 1 is actually the right answer.)

Also, if you happen to know of any case where Physics essentially 
depends on x^y where both x and y vary around 0, please do enlighten us.