Please rid me of this goto

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 23 June 2016 at 23:33:46 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> I don't want to argue this at all. x^^0 is an empty product no 
> matter what set I choose x and 0 from. 0^^0 = 1 is the only 
> reasonable convention, and this is absolutely painfully obvious 
> from where I stand. What context are you using 'pow' in that 
> would suggest otherwise?

You can build a non-analytical flavor of pow on top of the 
analytical flavor:
int pow1(int x, int y)
{
   if(x==0 && y==0)return 1;
   return pow(x,y);
}