DbI checked integral
Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jun 25 07:38:43 PDT 2016
On Friday, 24 June 2016 at 21:31:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> By default, if Hook has no state and implements none of these
> methods, e.g. is void, then Checked!(int, void) is a
> user-defined type that mimics the behavior of int to the
> maximum extent possible.
I think there is a major problem with the proposed design.
when Checked!(int, void) is to behave as an int, why do we need
it in the first place. I mean we have int as a basic type. Can't
we do:
alias Int = int;
alias Int = Checked!(int, SomeUsefulHook);
On second thought, the only feature of Checked!(int, void) is to
be a slower int ;-)
IMO the default CheckedInt!(int, void) needs a NaN like
init/failure state. After any operation that overflows the value
should be NaN.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list