Call to Action: making Phobos @safe
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jun 30 04:09:18 PDT 2016
On 6/29/16 4:57 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 6/29/2016 10:25 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
>> On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 22:56:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> On 6/25/2016 3:44 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>> 4. Add @safe to the unittest
>>>
>>> A unittest that is deliberately unsafe should be annotated with @system.
>>> Meaning that any un-annotated unittest needs corrective action one
>>> way or the
>>> other.
>>
>> What about existing tests that are marked @trusted?
>
> Marking a unittest as @trusted seems pointless.
>
I would further say -- if you see a @trusted unit test, whoever wrote it
doesn't understand the point of @trusted. Be sure and check the code it
is testing too, and file bugs if appropriate.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list