Field testing of std.experimental

[Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 29 February 2016 at 09:49:23 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
> Is there a central place to document field testing of packages 
> in std.experimental, to help determine when they are ready?
>
> Pegged has recently started using std.experimental.logging for 
> doing parse traces [1]. The only comment I have from this 
> application is that maybe there should be a way to omit the 
> time stamp decorations without creating a custom logger class 
> [2].
>
> Bastiaan.
>
> [1] 
> https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged/wiki/Grammar-Debugging
> [2] 
> https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged/blob/bc1679062d785ce9127070ed1c04bf2e1afaeaae/pegged/peg.d#L153

My comment is that I've had a hard time replacing the shared 
logger. When I swap it out none of my log() calls work, but it 
works as expected if I change them to sharedLog.log().

Since I haven't taken time to create a reduce test case I haven't 
filed a bug.