State of the Compiler

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 21:01:13 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
> 2016-03-01 12:22 GMT+01:00 Ola Fosheim Grøstad via 
> Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d at puremagic.com>:
>
>> On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 10:11:03 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 07:00:43 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If phobos isn't stable enough for the compiler, then it 
>>>> isn't stable enough for any major project.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not supported by evidence. Unstable ecosystems are 
>>> successfully used in major projects as long as they don't 
>>> have such circular dependencies.
>>>
>>
>> No circular dependency.
>>
>> Most _serious_ developers go for mature frameworks and 
>> libraries for major projects.
>>
>>
> https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/no-true-scotsman
>
> IMO this discussion belongs to dmd-internal. And there are a 
> lot of low hanging fruits to harvest before Phobos, some of 
> them don't even require compiler knowledge.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmRNmGhdYnU