std.database

[John Colvin via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 3 March 2016 at 11:16:03 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 21:00:30 UTC, Erik Smith wrote:
>> I'm back to actively working on a std.database specification & 
>> implementation.  It's still unstable, minimally tested, and 
>> there is plenty of work to do, but I wanted to share an update 
>> on my progress.
>
> I suggest you call the package stdx.db - it is not (and may not 
> become) a standard package, so `std` is out of question. If it 
> is supposed to be *proposed* as standard package, then `stdx` 
> is good because that is what some people have used in the past 
> (while others used the ugly std.experimental. for the same 
> purpose).
>
> I humbly believe that this effort **must** be collaborative as 
> such package is doomed to fail if done wrong.

std.experimental, ugly or not, is what is in phobos.
See std.experimental.allocator, std.experimental.logger and 
std.experimental.ndslice